Although it is clear the law was followed to the letter, lawyer Stephen D'Agostino and others are arguing that the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act is a law that now needs to be changed.

"Essentially what the act says is one strike and you're out," D'Agostino said. "There's a lot of difficulties with it, not only the severity of the penalty for small cases of conflict."

Lawyer Maureen Whelton agrees.

"It needs to have a result other than the seat shall be declared vacant," Whelton said. "It needs to have another option for the court."

Paul Magder, the man who brought forward the lawsuit against Ford, told CBC's Power and Politics on Tuesday that perhaps the law was put in place for a reason.

But when asked if the punishment for Ford was fitting to the crime, Magder said he wasn't sure.

"I believe that's what the rule is. I'm not sure if it fits the offence, but that's what it is," he said.

"The fact that the law is written so that the consequences are the vacating of that seat, of the mayor’s seat … I don’t know why it's so extreme, but if it had been something else, then he would have had to pay whatever the penalty was."

Myer Siemiatycki, a political scientist from Ryerson University, argued that the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act is exactly what it needs to be.

"I actually think the act gets it right in the kind of zero tolerance approach it takes," Siemiatycki said.

Ford is not the only municipal leader facing such a tough ruling. Hazel McCallion, who has been the mayor of Mississauga, Ont., for 33 years, is also in the middle of a court case under the same conflict of interest legislation.

The Ontario government is currently reviewing the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, but a spokesperson says they will not be expediting the review as a result of the Ford case.

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/ontario-law-ousted-rob-ford-now-under-scrutiny-012228802.html